Goal:
Increase 4th grade Math assessment scores for the 2013-2014
school year.
Action
Step
|
Person
Responsible
|
Timeline:
Start/End
|
Needed
Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
1.
|
Research grouping strategies for small
group instruction. Examine which
methods prove most effective when working with struggling learners.
|
Diana Wetzel
|
7/2013 through 5/2014
|
Professional case studies
time
|
Documenting which case study
influences the team’s decision of how to group our students.
|
2.
|
Research specific math teaching
strategies that are useful with increasing rigor.
|
Diana Wetzel
|
7/2013 through 5/2014
|
Professional case studies
Time
Observations/interviews with
successful teachers
|
Documenting which case study
influences the team’s decision of how to increase rigor in our daily
curriculum.
|
3.
|
Analyze student assessment data to
determine what specific need areas the incoming students have and group them
accordingly.
|
4th grade team
|
7/2013 through 5/2014
|
student assessment data
time
|
Detailed lists of # of students with
specific math weaknesses, categorized by assessment strand.
|
4.
|
Implement strategies for utilizing
intervention time wisely during the school day. Find a way to track the achievement of the
intervention students.
|
4th grade team
|
7/2013 through 5/2014
|
a possible online tool to assess a
particular concept
professional case studies for
improving math on elementary campuses
|
An explanation of the schedule/methods
used to organize intervention time.
|
5.
|
Compare MAP score growth from the fall
to the spring. Show average growth.
|
Diana Wetzel
|
6/2014
|
District online data tool
|
Overall average point increase as well
as analyzing specific growth of STAAR failures.
|
6.
|
Compare and analyze STAAR math scores
to compare passing percentiles to last year’s scores.
|
Diana Wetzel
|
6/2014
|
STAAR reports
|
Documentation of increase of STAAR
scores.
|
7.
|
Compare Boggess Elementary math scores
to like campus overall passing scores.
|
Diana Wetzel
|
6/2014
|
STAAR reports
|
Documentation of basic overall passing
percentages in math for our like campus group.
|
The outcomes of this project will be evident by our year end
STAAR scores as well as the comparisons of the MAP (Measures of Academic
Progress) scores from the fall to the spring.
The STAAR passing standards are increasing this year, so comparing the
2012 STAAR passing percentages with those of the 2014 scores may not show
accurate data, but remarkable growth and improvement on MAP scores and higher
than “like campus” scores throughout Plano ISD will show dramatic improvement. Ultimately, we would hope to see passing
standards in the 90th percentile.
In your goal to increase Math scores, there is no mention as to what you are doing, no evidence of the wondering so to speak.
ReplyDeleteWhat is your current passing rate?
I liked how you put "time" under resources needed, but that might be a given.
The timeline is very broad, I went the other with a week window of time - yo gave me something to think about. The action research is a continuous process and cyclical. I think very linearly (its the math person in me).
Christina,
ReplyDeleteI struggled with this specific format that we had to use. There didn't seem to be a place to fill in the details such as what our current passing standard is. I have stated it in many other posts. Our past year passing rate was 82%. Our ultimate goal is 90%. We are planning to work on grouping strategies to better utilize our intervention time, and changing how we plan so that we can add in more differentiation in our group work. I don't fully know exactly what strategies we will use, but that's what I'll be researching.
Thanks for the input.
Diana
I understand the reasons for your plan being broad and have the same feelings about it. I don't think, at this point there is any way we can pinpoint every possible strategy or project that we will use. To me that's the reason for the RESEARCH part of the project. Your timeline looks good and I think you and your team will have great plans throughout the year.
ReplyDeleteI also struggled with this format. I am interested in what strategies you find for increasing math rigor in 4th grade. I hate how the increasing standards on STAAR will make it hard for you to determine complete accuracy, but am glad you have other reliable assessments to compare with.
ReplyDeleteHi Diana!
ReplyDeleteI also understand the reasons for your plan being broad. As far as a timeline goes, I went first week by week and then got broader. The research portion of the project needs time and it will take time for you and your team to research, strategize, implement, deliver, and reflect upon specific math teaching strategies that are useful and that have a high level of rigor, etc. so to strive for those increased STAAR results that we all crave. As an Algebra I teacher, I am interested in what strategies you find and look forward to keeping up with your results!
Diana -
ReplyDeleteI love your idea. I am a former math teacher as well. What are your plans if any to deal with the sub pops? Will this be a component of your research?
Overall it looks good. Like previous comments say it seems like a lot of data so maybe you will find as you progress that its easier to focus on a select group. Either way I think you'll do fine and the only way to find out how this will work is by starting it!
ReplyDeleteMy understanding is that the Action Research Plan is a living document. At first my plan was fairly broad but then I just threw in some ideas that were floating around in my head. I figure I can change it as we go along. I already had a new idea from a comment someone had posted. Good luck!
ReplyDelete