Thursday, August 15, 2013

week 5 reflection



Honestly, up until this class, the word “research” had a very different meaning to me.  I envisioned being knee deep in professional case studies and leather bound books and the only product coming from the work would be a well cited report style paper that would undoubtedly be filed away, and never affect anyone.  Clearly, I was wrong.  An Action research project is a “systematic, intentional study of one’s own professional practice.” (Dana, 2009, p9)  An action research project requires action, hence the name.  One must find some question or dilemma on a campus or district that needs further investigation to ultimately make positive change.  The simple idea of this sounds exciting doesn’t it?  Honestly, anyone who’s longed to or actually been in a leadership position has an intrinsic need to be better and make improvements. 
            Leading an action research project should be an extension of your everyday life at school.  I don’t know many teachers who do things exactly the same way every year because new needs arise, new children bring new challenges, and of course standards and state expectations are ever changing.  So with each new year comes a new set of goals, problems and general wonderings; and a project is born.  Good teachers may not have officially planned out all of their action steps on paper, but they’ve surely researched an idea, put it into action and evaluated the effectiveness of the new strategy. 
            As we all embarked on this journey together, many of us in class have wondered: How will I ever have time for all of the work this year.  According to Dana, “Another way to create time for inquiry by making it a part of your normal administrative practice is to formulate a study based on something you must do anyway.” (Dana, 2009, p16)  I took this to heart when formulating my plan.  Not necessarily for ease, but out of common sense.  Increasing the 4th graders Math STAAR scores must be a primary focus for my team of 8 teachers this year, in order to erase the blemish on our previous outstanding record.  It’s a goal that my principal and I had been discussing before I even began my classes here at Lamar.  It alone is a daunting task that took me a bit to even formulate a plan; and I’m sure my plan will be adjusted as I go.  Any good action research project is going to initially have flaws and need to be changed to accommodate both the environment and the situations that will surely arise. 
            One of the most eye opening aspects of starting an action research project is how critical self-reflection can be to guiding your plan.  According to Harris, “Leaders cannot accurately examine the work to improve schools without following Step 4, Engaging in Self-reflection.” (Harris, 2010, p 55)  In order to decide to focus on flexible grouping on my team for my project I really had to look within to my teacher practices.  If you ask most district officials and teachers they would probably say that flexible grouping is the norm in their district.  Yes, we do have changing groups for small group instruction, the question is: are the groupings done in a meaningful, purpose driven way, or simply on “gut” feeling.  We’ve often used test scores that are only measured 2 times a year to group students, but it still doesn’t mean that every student in each group is starting at the same academic starting point.  Using a pre-assessment model may hopefully make groupings more deliberate and result in higher student performance. 
            Overall, this class has made me reevaluate how I will think about wanting to affect change on my team, my campus or even my district.  Action Research is much like conducting a scientific experiment in order to prove or disprove a theory designed to improve campus/student climate.   However, where this varies from a simple science experiment is that based the results you must continue to implement variations of your plan; one that is ever changing. 

Saturday, August 10, 2013

revised action research plan

I was really excited this week.  I went to our district math update training and was able to speak to the head of math curriculum for our district.  I talked to her about my research about flexible grouping which is generally done with a unit pre-assessment.  She was able to recommend resources that I could pull the pre-assessment materials from and gave me her blessing, so to speak.  In a big district, doing something different isn't always considered good.  She was so interested that she wants to see my data and report when I'm done.  She implied that it could help them go in that direction on a district level.  :)   So I now finally have the actual thing that I'm going to use to prove or disprove my action research project.  So here is my more detailed plan:




Action Research Project Template
Goal:  Increase 4th grade Math assessment scores for the 2013-2014 school year.
Question: Will implementing a pre-assessment driven system of flexible grouping within our math instructional time increase Unit test scores as well as STAAR scores?

Action Step
Person Responsible
Timeline:
Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
1.
Research flexible grouping strategies and previous case studies.
Diana Wetzel
7/2013 8/2013
Professional case studies
time

Documenting which case study influences the team’s decision of how to group our students.
2.
Share with the 4th grade team the data behind the new approach and explain how we will implement it.
Diana Wetzel
And
4th grade teachers
8/21/2013
Powerpoint presentation
Copy of presentation
3.
Create pre-assessments for each major math unit.
Diana Wetzel
Aug 2013-May 2014
Lone Star assessment guide
Access data base
Files containing major concepts covered and pre-assessments to match.
4.
4th grade teachers will give a small pre-assessment 1 week prior to each new unit. Then use the outcomes to help divide the students into groups based on concepts that are of concern.
4th grade team
Aug 2013-May 2014
Class time of 10-20 min.
Evidence that students were grouped differently based on assessments.
5.
Document as a team passing percentiles for unit assessments.
4th grade team
7/2013 through 5/2014
Excel program

Time

Team cooperation
Document showing passing percentiles per teacher and for entire grade level.
6.
Compare MAP score growth from the fall to the spring.  Show average growth.
Diana Wetzel
6/2014
District online data tool

Overall average point increase as well as analyzing specific growth of STAAR failures.
7.
Compare and analyze STAAR math scores to compare passing percentiles to last year’s scores.
Diana Wetzel
6/2014
STAAR reports


Documentation of increase of STAAR scores. 
8.
Compare Boggess Elementary math scores to like campus overall passing scores. Specifically to a like campus that only groups by RIT score
Diana Wetzel
6/2014
STAAR reports
Documentation of basic overall passing percentages in math for our like campus group.
9.
Share data with my team leader group, my principal and the head of math curriculum, Julia Haun.
 Diana Wetzel
June 2013
time
Copy of report and notations of any feedback that I may receive from participants.

The outcomes of this project will be evident by our year end STAAR scores as well as the comparisons of the MAP (Measures of Academic Progress) scores from the fall to the spring.  The STAAR passing standards have just been recently decided to stay in a phase 1 for an additional year, so comparisons to last year’s scores should be an indicator of progress.  Ultimately, we would hope to see passing standards in the 90th percentile.

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Action Research revisions

It's hard to believe that this course is about to be over.  I think our group is so fortunate to be able to start our Action Research Projects at the beginning of the school year.  I waiting to hear back from my site supervisor to get her feed back on whether I should focus on a smaller sub group or compare my class to another.  This is a critical year for STAAR scores, so I feel that she'll want me to stick with the overall team aspect, but time will tell.  I do plan on adding details to my plan like a more specific time schedule for research completion and weekly team meetings (which is something that we already do.) I also will be adding the compilation and analysis of unit assessment scores.

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Action research stress

I'm really taking some time to catch up on my blogging.  And, as I read many action research templates, I see some of the extreme detail that is going into some of these.  The problem is, if I had the answers and knew exactly how I was going to raise our math scores, I would have done it last year.  So, my project has to start with researching different methods, then implementing them.  Plus, I'm planning to work with my team to work out how we will all share the load.  So I have a lot of work to do....but I have an awesome team and I know that we're up to the challenge.

Action Research Template



Goal:  Increase 4th grade Math assessment scores for the 2013-2014 school year.

Action Step
Person Responsible
Timeline:
Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
1.
Research grouping strategies for small group instruction.  Examine which methods prove most effective when working with struggling learners.
Diana Wetzel
7/2013 through 5/2014
Professional case studies
time

Documenting which case study influences the team’s decision of how to group our students.
2.
Research specific math teaching strategies that are useful with increasing rigor.
Diana Wetzel
7/2013 through 5/2014
Professional case studies
Time
Observations/interviews with successful teachers

Documenting which case study influences the team’s decision of how to increase rigor in our daily curriculum.
3.
Analyze student assessment data to determine what specific need areas the incoming students have and group them accordingly.
4th grade team
7/2013 through 5/2014
student assessment data
time
Detailed lists of # of students with specific math weaknesses, categorized by assessment strand.
4.
Implement strategies for utilizing intervention time wisely during the school day.  Find a way to track the achievement of the intervention students.
4th grade team
7/2013 through 5/2014
a possible online tool to assess a particular concept
professional case studies for improving math on elementary campuses
An explanation of the schedule/methods used to organize intervention time.
5.
Compare MAP score growth from the fall to the spring.  Show average growth.
Diana Wetzel
6/2014
District online data tool

Overall average point increase as well as analyzing specific growth of STAAR failures.
6.
Compare and analyze STAAR math scores to compare passing percentiles to last year’s scores.
Diana Wetzel
6/2014
STAAR reports


Documentation of increase of STAAR scores. 
7.
Compare Boggess Elementary math scores to like campus overall passing scores.
Diana Wetzel
6/2014
STAAR reports
Documentation of basic overall passing percentages in math for our like campus group.

The outcomes of this project will be evident by our year end STAAR scores as well as the comparisons of the MAP (Measures of Academic Progress) scores from the fall to the spring.  The STAAR passing standards are increasing this year, so comparing the 2012 STAAR passing percentages with those of the 2014 scores may not show accurate data, but remarkable growth and improvement on MAP scores and higher than “like campus” scores throughout Plano ISD will show dramatic improvement.  Ultimately, we would hope to see passing standards in the 90th percentile.